Morrow helps your assistant audit and fix repeated course problems across many courses.
Start with the assistant and course access your team already has. Review the program courses your team selects, group repeated problems by their source page or course template, and prepare changes your assistant can apply through Morrow.
Review course quality.
- Forty courses read in one pass.
- 612 findings traced back to three shared templates.
- Local subject wording left exactly as it is.
Separate repairs from teaching decisions.
Review course pages, assignments, discussions, and directly listed New Quiz questions through Morrow. Complete the accessibility review with separate file, caption, document, keyboard, screen-reader, and learner-view checks.
- 1
Choose the courses. Let your assistant audit the course content through Morrow. Then list the files, captions, documents, keyboard use, screen-reader use, and learner-view checks that still need a person.
- 2
Group findings by template and problem, so your team can review each affected course.
- 3
Compare each proposal with its page, assignment, discussion, or quiz, approve the repairs, and inspect any result Morrow cannot confirm.
Coordinate a program review.
See which findings have a proposed fix, which need a faculty decision, and which still need a person to inspect them.
Prepare the Review
Review Many Courses Together
Audit course content across every course you selected. Anything your assistant could not finish reading is marked, so a gap never reads as a clean result.
What You Get: Findings by course, by template, and by the exact page, assignment, discussion, or quiz, plus a short list of what still needs a person.Find the Repeated Cause
Compare templates, module patterns, wording, headings, image descriptions, and the assignment and discussion problems that keep coming back.
What You Get: The sources behind repeated findings, so you can review the highest-impact work first.
Manage Approved Repairs
Carry Approved Fixes Across Courses
Send approved fixes to the courses you name. Morrow checks each result that it can safely read back and keeps unconfirmed items visible.
What You Get: A clear record of matched results and work that still needs attention.Finish the Learner-View Review
Combine the course-content checks with file, document, caption, keyboard, screen-reader, learner-view, and subject review.
What You Get: One review that says where every result came from, and where it stops.
Keep the review useful.
A program review shows what your assistant read through Morrow, what changed, and which results matched what the course saved. Your team adds the file, document, caption, keyboard, screen-reader, learner-view, and expert evidence needed for a complete accessibility review.
What Your Team Can Prepare
Choose the Courses and Pages
Name the courses, pages, assignments, and discussions you want to review.
What You Get: A review that stays focused on the work your team chose.Repairs Ready for Review
Each proposal shows the current content, the replacement, and the course where it belongs.
What You Get: A coordinated set of changes your team can read before applying them.Work Your Team Checked
Keep your notes beside each page, assignment, discussion, quiz, or separate check that you reviewed.
What You Get: A clear record of the decisions your team made.
Complete the Evidence
Test the Learner Experience
Add file, document, caption, keyboard, screen-reader, learner-view, and subject evidence. Morrow does not perform or certify these checks.
What You Get: Your team’s judgement recorded beside what your assistant found.Never Call Unread Work a Pass
Every course result says whether your assistant read it, could not finish it, or left it for a person to judge.
What You Get: Nothing your assistant did not read is ever reported as fixed.Share a Clear Next Step
Give faculty the affected content, the reason it needs their input, and the choice they need to make.
What You Get: A handoff that helps the right person move the work forward.
Improve discussion design.
Compare discussion instructions with when students actually post.
- What the prompt asks, beside what students did.
- Faculty subject questions kept word for word.
- Sections on another calendar listed, not moved.
Questions Quality Teams Ask.
How your assistant uses Morrow for course checks at scale and keeps separate accessibility evidence visible.
Does a review certify accessibility?
No. Morrow audits course text, structure, image descriptions, and directly listed New Quiz questions at scale. Your team adds file contents, caption tracks, keyboard and screen-reader tests, learner-view checks, and expert judgment to complete the accessibility evidence.
Can one repair plan cover many courses?
Yes. Choose the courses, read the proposed change for each item, and approve the set. Morrow’s review page keeps the result and any open work visible for you.
Can my assistant write the team report?
Yes. Your assistant takes what it read through Morrow and builds the briefing or chart with its own tools. The report must keep incomplete reads and separate evidence checks distinct from confirmed results.
Which fixes can my assistant manage through Morrow?
Your assistant can use Morrow to prepare and apply course-page corrections and direct New Quiz image descriptions. For Item Bank work, it can create a bank, add and update its items, and add the bank or a random draw to a quiz. A share read always stays marked incomplete because Morrow cannot confirm that it found every share.
What happens when a repair needs attention?
Morrow’s review page keeps that item visible with the reason it needs review, so you can open it in the course and decide what to do next.
Your First Request.
Start with one selected course, then carry the same review across the program. Replace the name in brackets with your own. This request reads the course and makes no changes.